Can DCS HMI impact operator performance
Many recent accidents have clearly identified the contribution of bad alarm management practices as a major contribution. Action has been taken by regulators, standards bodies and customer forums to provide good guidance on alarm improvement, targets have been set through organizations like EEMUA who have effectively raised the bar in all industrial sectors. However, many struggle still with alarm management, especially alarm floods, and will continue to, until they address their HMI issues.
Little has been published on the contribution of poor HMI design but the significant contribution to major accidents and losses is evident in the accident reports. Common themes being loss of the big picture, data overload, missed information or alarms, operators being reactive and waiting, they are operating by alarms.
The continued use of crowded graphics with no color restrictions producing visual noise is still not on many managers radar. Even though best practices and use of grey-scale graphics have been identified as a major step forward and have demonstrated the ability to improve an operators performance to detect, diagnose and recover from abnormal situations.
A new topic to our industry but not too many others is Situation Awareness and how alarms are just tool to help an operator become aware of change, this topic looks at our past and demonstrates how our operators' HMI used to be less dependent on alarms through the continuous monitoring of plant and process trends and the ability to see the "big picture".
We have the technology today to address these issues, our DCS systems are very capable but are being abused by over use of color and fancy three dimensional graphics that are compromising situation awareness.
We will never resolve alarm management issues until we get the balance right and focus attention on good HMI practices, many now have a written alarm philosophy, how many have a HMI philosophy. To mitigate major accidents and losses we need high performance HMI that truly impacts an operators performance. What we have today does not work and has proven that it exposes us to unacceptable risk.
This was originally posted in "The Process Automation Usability Project." See the responses he got there and contribute with your own here.
Katherine Bonfante is Senior Web Editor for ControlGlobal.com and ControlDesign.com. Email her at kbonfante@putman.net or check out her Google+ profile.
Dan Miklovic is a 40+ year veteran of manufacturing. He has worked for end-user companies in discrete and process manufacturing, consulting companies, software vendors and as an analyst. After retiring from Gartner at the end of 2010, where he founded and led the Manufacturing Industry Advisory Services practice, he formed his own advisory practice, Lean Manufacturing Research. With degrees in Nuclear Technology, Electrical Engineering and Management Science and certifications in Manufacturing Engineering and Lean, he is a recognized thought leader on the topic of manufacturing productivity. From MAP in the 1980's to Enterprise Architecture this decade, he has written about how to leverage information technology to empower staff at manufacturing facilities. The author of over 50 books, articles and technical papers he appeared on national TV as a cohost of World Business Review, has been a faculty member of Central Washington University, and a leader of in several technical societies.